<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ruby for Windows &#8211; Part 1</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.mmediasys.com/2008/01/17/ruby-for-windows-part-1/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.mmediasys.com/2008/01/17/ruby-for-windows-part-1/</link>
	<description>Compartiendo fragmentos de código con el mundo.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 07 Mar 2010 15:27:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Is Windows a First Class Platform for Ruby?</title>
		<link>http://blog.mmediasys.com/2008/01/17/ruby-for-windows-part-1/comment-page-1/#comment-100</link>
		<dc:creator>Is Windows a First Class Platform for Ruby?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2008 07:46:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mmediasys.com/2008/01/17/ruby-for-windows-part-1/#comment-100</guid>
		<description>[...] advantage of a Linux-esque build system for Ruby libraries in future. Back in January, Luis wrote Ruby for Windows, a post where he elaborated on these ideas and wrote candidly about the state of Ruby on Windows [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] advantage of a Linux-esque build system for Ruby libraries in future. Back in January, Luis wrote Ruby for Windows, a post where he elaborated on these ideas and wrote candidly about the state of Ruby on Windows [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
